 |
A soldier prays with anti-government protesters
|
Many reasons will be cited to explain the success of what has been dubbed "the Egyptian Revolution". (By the way I am still curious to know whether Prof Levitsky would categorize this as a revolution.) For me, though, this pictures here capture the reason the uprising went as it did and why it cannot be replicated in many countries South or West of Egypt.
 |
Protesters shake hands with soldiers
|
|
Nowhere in Sub-Saharan region do you find such a relationship of neutrality between the military and the people. It is either the military ousts an incumbent government in a coup or the incumbent government uses the military to stave off an uprising. In either case you expect a lot of blood and little departure from political and economic status quo.
It is therefore only sensible to treat Egypt as a unique case which cannot be scaled up to other countries facing similar political woes, given heterogeneity of conditions in those countries. Instead, I would interest myself in establishing whether Egypt's military relations with the US, domestic institutions, culture and/or religion could be cited to explain why the military practiced such restraint.
No comments:
Post a Comment